Coffee Does Not Taste Like Fruit — Coffee Contains Fruit

One of the most misunderstood statements in coffee is this:

provocative Taste Palate by Alfred Gitau Mwaura

“This coffee tastes like mango, berries, or spice.”

To many people, that sounds like imagination, exaggeration, or personal opinion.
But here’s the truth:

By Kenya Coffee School & Barista Mtaani

Coffee does not taste like fruit. Coffee is a fruit — and the tastes are already inside it.

The coffee bean is the seed of a cherry. Everything we perceive in the cup originates from real chemical compounds formed in the fruit, the seed, fermentation, drying, roasting, and brewing. Nothing is added. Nothing is imagined.


Coffee Is Not Subjective — Coffee Is Objective

People often say: “Taste is subjective.”
That statement is convenient — but incomplete.

Subjective means biased.
Coffee quality is not biased.

Coffee is evaluated through:

  • Chemistry
  • Sensory science
  • Calibrated human perception
  • Reproducible standards

This is why professional cupping protocols exist. This is why trained tasters independently arrive at similar descriptions and scores for the same coffee.

The coffee does not change. The taster does.


You Cannot Describe a Fruit You Have Never Tasted

Here’s a simple truth that makes people uncomfortable:

You cannot describe what you have never experienced.

If someone has never tasted:

  • Blackcurrant
  • Stone fruit
  • Cardamom
  • Citrus zest

Then those references will feel imaginary — not because they are false, but because the sensory memory does not exist.

Coffee tasting is not guessing.
It is recognition.


Smell vs Perception vs Recognition

Let’s break this down.

How many smells can you perceive?

Science suggests humans can perceive trillions of odor combinations.

How many smells can you recognize?

Very few — limited by:

  • Exposure
  • Training
  • Memory
  • Language

How many smells can you name?

Even fewer.

This gap is why people say:

“I smell something… but I don’t know what it is.”

That does not make the aroma subjective.
It means the vocabulary and memory are underdeveloped.


Name One Truly Subjective Recognition

Try this exercise:

Name one aroma that is purely subjective
One that no other trained taster can agree on.

You will struggle.

Why?

Because aromas are chemical realities.
Recognition varies, but the compounds remain constant.


Your Tongue Is Not a Judge — It Is an Instrument

Your tongue does not decide quality.
It detects:

  • Sweetness
  • Acidity
  • Bitterness
  • Saltiness
  • Umami

That’s it.

Flavor lives mostly in the nose, memory, and brain.

So when someone says:

“I don’t taste that.”

What they are really saying is:

“My sensory database is still small.”

That’s not an insult.
It’s a starting point.


What the Coffee Industry Actually Sells

We like to say we sell:

  • Taste
  • Aroma
  • Fragrance

But that’s only half the story.

We sell recognition.
We sell value as perceived by the buyer.

A buyer pays for what they can:

  • Recognize
  • Trust
  • Reproduce
  • Explain to their market

This is why training, calibration, and shared language matter more than personal preference.


The Final Truth

Coffee is not imagination.
Coffee is not opinion.
Coffee is not “vibes.”

Coffee is chemistry interpreted through trained human senses.

The more you taste,
the more you recognize.

And recognition — not subjectivity —
is where real coffee value lives.


— Kenya Coffee School Editorial Desk
Building calibrated palates, shared language, and real value in coffee.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *